ArticleCureus2025
Clinical Profile and Morbidity Patterns in Neonates Born Through Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid Based on a Prospective Observational Study From a Rural Tertiary Care Center in India.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Meconium observed in the amniotic fluid during delivery may warrant clinical monitoring due to potential neonatal complications. This study aimed to assess the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) at a rural tertiary care center in India. Materials and methods A prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a rural tertiary hospital. A total of 126 inborn neonates with MSAF were enrolled. Maternal and neonatal demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and Pearson's correlation for univariate associations, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of MAS and related outcomes. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The incidence of MAS among neonates born through MSAF was 31.8% (40/126). The independent predictors of MAS included multigravida status (odds ratio [OR] = 3.633; p = 0.012), post-term gestation (OR = 4.126; p = 0.040), and maternal comorbidities (OR = 0.189; p = 0.003). MAS significantly predicted the need for resuscitation (OR = 0.038; p < 0.001), oxygen therapy (OR = 0.009; p < 0.001), shock (OR = 0.023; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR = 0.089; p < 0.001), persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) (OR = 0.019; p < 0.001), and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) (OR = 0.028; p < 0.001). Abnormal creatinine-phosphokinase myocardial band (CPK-MB) levels (OR = 34.0; p < 0.001), abnormal chest X-ray findings (OR = 64.8; p < 0.001), and increased NICU stay (OR = 0.129; p < 0.001) were also strongly associated. Neonatal mortality was significantly higher among MAS cases (OR = 4.703; p = 0.009). Conclusion MAS remains a significant contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings. Early identification of at-risk neonates, improved targeted intrapartum monitoring, and timely resuscitative efforts are crucial. Integration of standardized MAS risk assessment protocols, strengthening emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC) infrastructure, and implementing regular staff training at all healthcare levels are urgently needed. Multicentric validation studies should also be prioritized to guide evidence-based interventions and reduce MAS-related complications in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.