ReviewCureus2025
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Electromagnetic Waves on Living Beings.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetite sand as a low-cost material for electromagnetic shielding and mechanical enhancement of concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Non-chemical, chemical, and biochemical, endocrine disruptors: biphasic health effects and pathophysiological insights.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have been extensively debated among researchers and the public, with their critical consequences often dismissed or deemed unscientific. In light of this, we conducted this systematic review that extensively focuses on the detrimental effects of EMFs on living organisms. A comprehensive and systematic literature search was performed on various electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This review concentrates on experimental studies published between 2017 and 2024 that investigated physiological or behavioral responses to EMF exposure, with particular attention given to those reporting harmful or concerning effects. Documented impacts include effects on humans, animals, and plants, targeting various cell types (e.g., blood, cancer, thyroid, cochlea), genotoxicity, cardiovascular parameters (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure), male fertility (e.g., testes, sperm), neuronal brain activity, and photosynthesis in plants. Methodological quality was assessed using established bias assessment tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE framework. After screening, 24 studies were included in the present review; five studies were non-randomized and involved humans, seven studies were in vitro, and 12 studies were conducted on animals. The findings demonstrated that EMFs negatively affect a wide array of biological systems of living organisms, including mechanisms of oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, and disruptions in cellular, physiological, and ecological processes. Most of the included studies showed a moderate to high risk of bias, which contributed to a lower overall certainty of the evidence. These findings underscore the significant health and environmental risks associated with rising exposure levels of EMF, highlighting the urgent need for strategies to mitigate the risks. Despite these valuable insights, significant research gaps persist because the long-term effects of EMF exposure, especially on human populations, remain poorly understood and warrant further investigation and targeted mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.