Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970666›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Association Between Pigmentation Heritage and Susceptibility to Experimentally Induced Myopia: Crossbreeding Insights From Albino and Pigmented Guinea Pigs.

Liqin Jiang, Yee Shan Dan, William E Myles, Sherlyn H Y Seah, James H Z Koh, Myo Thu Khine, Leopold Schmetterer, Veluchamy A Barathi, Quan V Hoang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liqin JiangSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS, Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Yee Shan DanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS, Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
William E MylesSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS, Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Sherlyn H Y SeahSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS, Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
James H Z KohSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS, Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Myo Thu KhineSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS, Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Leopold SchmettererSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS, Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Veluchamy A BarathiSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS, Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Quan V HoangSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS, Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate how pigmentation heritage affects susceptibility to form deprivation myopia (FDM) through crossbreeding myopia-susceptible albino and myopia-resistant pigmented guinea pigs (GPs). Methods: Ninety GPs (albino: n = 29, pigmented: n = 29, F1 crossbred: n = 32) were studied. Eye parameters were measured using retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasound. Scotopic electroretinograms were recorded by full-field electroretinography in 36 naive GPs at 1 and 5 weeks of age. Monocular form deprivation (FD) was applied from 1 to 5 weeks of age in 27 GPs, with 27 littermates as controls. The retina, choroid, and sclera were imaged using optical coherence tomography. From control GPs at 5 weeks, scleral melanin was assessed histologically; choroidal melanin and tyrosinase activity in the choroid and sclera were quantified biochemically. Results: Crossbreds had a pigmented appearance, and choroidal thickness (ChT, 100 ± 19 µm) was thicker than in albino GPs (69 ± 12 µm, P < 0.001) but thinner than in pigmented GPs (124 ± 19 µm, P = 0.004). Choroidal melanin content and tyrosinase activity followed similar patterns and were significantly different (one-way ANOVA): highest in pigmented GPs, intermediate in crossbreds, and undetectable in albinos. Albinos exhibited the largest a-wave amplitudes across the intensity-response functions among the three breeds. Crossbreds displayed a monotonic b-wave intensity-response function, similar to but with higher amplitudes than pigmented GPs, whereas albinos showed a bell-shaped response pattern before the second rise. FD induced significant myopic shift and axial elongation in albinos (spherical equivalent [SE]: -7.83 ± 4.74 D, P = 0.001; axial length [AL]: 0.20 ± 0.14 mm, P = 0.003) and crossbreds (SE: -5.42 ± 2.90 D, P < 0.001; AL: 0.17 ± 0.09 mm, P = 0.001). Pigmented GPs showed a mild myopic shift (-2.08 ± 1.93 D, P = 0.01) with no significant AL changes (0.03 ± 0.08 mm, P = 0.357). FDM severity differed across breeds (SE: P = 0.006, AL: P = 0.004); thicker baseline ChT was associated with less FDM in crossbreds (P = 0.027) and reduced axial elongation in albinos (P = 0.004); retinal and scleral thicknesses were nonpredictive. Conclusions: Crossbreeding improved retinal function and choroidal morphology, while preserving susceptibility to FDM, suggesting a partial restoration of myopia-inducible mechanisms inherited from the albino lineage. These findings support the value of the crossbred model for investigating retinal and choroidal regulation in myopia.

Indexed as

Albinism, OcularGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMyopiaAnimalsChoroidDisease Models, AnimalElectroretinographyFemaleGuinea PigsMaleMelaninsMonophenol MonooxygenaseRetinaRetinoscopyScleraTomography, Optical CoherenceMelaninsMonophenol Monooxygenase

Identifiers

PMID40970666
PMCPMC12453062

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.