ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Echoes of Inequity: A Critical Examination of the Past, Present, and Future of Cardiac Health Equity.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional limitation and cardiometabolic health: a cross-sectional exploration in adults aged 30 and older in rural Punjab, India.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap in Racial/Ethnic Disparities: Perspectives from the 2025 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology High Blood Pressure Guideline.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review explores the historical, structural, and biological foundations of cardiovascular (CV) health inequities in the U.S. It examines how disparities by ancestry, sex, geography, income, immigration status, and race have emerged, persisted, and, in some cases, worsened while evaluating strategies for advancing equity. RECENT
findingsDespite progress in prevention and treatment, key disparities remain entrenched. Structural inequities, socioeconomic exclusion, and underrepresentation in research continue to shape outcomes. Social adversity is increasingly understood to exert biological effects through mechanisms such as chronic stress, cardio-kidney-metabolic dysfunction, and epigenetic aging. Novel tools, including place-based deprivation indices, precision risk prediction models, and community-driven interventions offer actionable pathways forward but remain underutilized or unevenly implemented. Cardiac health equity requires more than clinical innovation; it demands structural reform, inclusive science, and equity-centered implementation. Future solutions must embed social context into care, research, and policy to drive durable, population-level impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.