ArticleJournal of global health2025
Use and implications of the Apgar score in evaluating resuscitation of newborns with birth asphyxia in a lower-middle-income country.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint associations between maternal exposure to ambient air pollutants during pregnancy and low Apgar score in newborns: a birth cohort study in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Facilitating quality improvement activities related to newborn care in low- and middle-income countries: challenges and possible solutions.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Review
- CHS-DRG 2.0 and insurance-specific patient cost sharing in gestational diabetes admissions: a regression discontinuity in time study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) programme has been used worldwide to address neonatal mortality due to birth asphyxia in low resource countries. We aimed to use the Apgar score to evaluate the impact of the programme on neonatal mortality in three district and one regional hospital in Ghana, a lower middle-income country. Methods: We used Apgar scores as an objective measure of newborn infants' condition soon after birth and their response to resuscitation, with the assessment carried out primarily by midwives who were trained in HBB. We analysed correlations between Apgar scores and mortality in newborns ≥34 weeks gestation who had birth asphyxia (BA), i.e. a one-minute Apgar score <7, and severe BA, i.e. a one-minute Apgar score ≤3. Results: Over the 18-month period from October 2019 to March 2021, 12 995 newborns were delivered at ≥34 weeks gestation or with a birth weight of at least 2000 grams. There were 12 702 live births and 293 stillbirths, of which 134 were intrapartum stillbirths. Among the live births, 2387(18.9%) had BA, including 352 (2.8%) who had severe BA. There was no significant difference in the trend of cases of severe BA or deaths due to BA in the four hospitals, either individually or combined, but there was a 55% decline in intrapartum stillbirths, from 1.6% to 0.89% (P = 0.03). Although many babies with BA showed improvement in Apgar scores with resuscitation efforts, the mortality rate among 352 newborns with severe BA was 15.6% - twenty times higher than in the 2045 newborns with a one-minute Apgar score of 4-6, among whom 0.78% died (P < 0.001). The mortality rate in newborns with severe BA was higher in those whose scores remained ≤3 than in those whose scores rose to 4-6 or more at five minutes (odds ratio = 19.93, 95% confidence interval = 9.4-42.1, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The Apgar score provides valuable information about where additional interventions may decrease BA related neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.