Evidence mapPaperPMID 40971887Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025

The transcriptomics of phenotypic nonspecificity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Gabriella Sidhu, Anthony Percival-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriella SidhuDepartment of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.
Anthony Percival-SmithDepartment of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2129-8160

Funding

Natural Science and Engineering Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factor (TF) function is redundant: TF phenotypes are frequently rescued by TFs not resident to the TF locus, a phenomenon termed phenotypic nonspecificity. Phenotypic nonspecificity in Drosophila melanogaster is not dependent on the DNA binding specificity of the TFs and generally due to genetic complementation. Two TF phenotypes (doublesex [dsx] and apterous [ap]) are rescued by multiple TFs. The rescue by resident TFs (DSXF or AP) and the rescue and non-rescue by nonresident TFs of these 2 phenotypes were used to distinguish between 3 possible outcomes of the comparison of the TF-dependent mRNA accumulation in these 2 systems. First, the sets of TF-dependent mRNAs are independent and nonoverlapping; second, the sets of TF-dependent mRNAs are independent and overlapping; and third, the sets of TF-dependent mRNAs are constrained and have extensive overlap. The transcriptomes associated with rescue by resident TFs, and rescue and non-rescue by nonresident TFs, of the 2 TF phenotypes (dsx and ap) provided many examples of extensive overlap indicating regulation of constrained sets of genes. However, the strength of correlation of transcript accumulation observed between the resident and nonresident TFs was not a strong predictor for rescue of the phenotype by the nonresident TFs. The accumulation of a constrained set of mRNAs is discussed in relation to 3 potential explanations of phenotypic nonspecificity: limited specificity of TF function, the hypothetical assembly of TFs into wolfpacks, and chromatin accessibility.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingPhenotypeTranscriptomeAnimalsDrosophila ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription Factors2-step nuclear searchapterousdevelopmental geneticsdoublesexredundancyRNAseqtranscription factor function

Identifiers

PMID40971887
PMCPMC12611258

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.