ReviewHeart rhythm2026
Cardioneural ablation: Toward achieving uniformity in nomenclature, procedural approaches, and outcome measures.
Review in Heart rhythm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcatheter epicardial pacing of the human Bachmann's bundle via the transverse sinus: Novel technique to expand transcatheter cardiac intervention.HeartRhythm case reports · 2026Article
- Cardioneuroablation for Reflex Syncope and Functional Bradyarrhythmias: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Innervation of the Human Atrioventricular Node via the Inferior Pyramidal Space: Characterization Using Intersectional Strategies.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cardiac autonomic nervous system plays a pivotal role in regulating heart function through a complex network of extrinsic and intrinsic components, including ganglionated plexi (GPs). Cardioneuroablation (CNA), a novel therapeutic approach targeting GPs, has emerged as a treatment for cardio-inhibitory vasovagal syncope and select atrioventricular block cases. However, heterogeneity in anatomical nomenclature, GP identification techniques, ablation strategies, and procedural end points limits standardization. Although methods such as high-frequency stimulation, electroanatomic mapping, and anatomical guidance are used to localize GPs, each has limitations. CNA has demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes; however, concerns regarding long-term efficacy, reinnervation, and safety-particularly related to ventricular arrhythmia risk-remain. This review critically reviews the studies from the basic science of the cardiac autonomic nervous system to the latest clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for unified terminology, patient selection criteria, procedural techniques, and the necessity for long-term, multicenter studies to optimize CNA's safety and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.