ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Interactive effects among fiber and fat sources on energy and fat digestion in 53- to 74-kg pigs.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nutritional Composition and Digestibility of Corn Ethanol Coproducts in Swine Feed: A Systematic Literature Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An experiment consisting of two groups of 60 pigs was conducted to determine interactive effects between fiber source, fat source, and week of fecal sampling on apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter (DM), ether extract (EE), gross energy (GE), and total dietary fiber (TDF) in 53- to 74-kg pigs. Diets were formulated based on corn-soybean meal (CSBM, 15.4% TDF) or a CSBM diet with 35% distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS, 20.6% TDF), 15% soybean hulls (SH, 23.0% TDF), or 30% sugar beet pulp (BP, 28.4% TDF), in combination with no added fat, 10% tallow (TL), or 10% soybean oil (SO). Feces were collected on d 7, 14, and 21 to determine ATTD of DM, EE, GE, and neutral detergent fiber (NDF). There were no significant week × diet × fat, week × diet, or week × fat interactions noted (P > 0.10) for any parameter measured; there was, however, a diet × fat interaction (P ≤ 0.01) and week effect (P ≤ 0.01) for each parameter measured. Adding 10% TL increased the ATTD of EE in pigs fed the CSBM- and BP-based diets more than in pigs fed DDGS- or SH-based diets with added TL. In contrast, adding 10% SO increased the ATTD of EE in pigs fed CSBM-, SH-, and BP-based diets more than in those fed the DDGS-based diet with added SO. Adding 10% TL increased ATTD of NDF in the pigs fed the CSBM- and SH-based diets to a greater degree compared to pigs fed the DDGS- or BP-based diets with added TL, while adding 10% SO increased ATTD of NDF in pigs fed the CSBM-, DDGS-, and SH-based diets to a greater degree compared to pigs fed the BP-based diet with added SO. The ATTD of GE was difficult to interpret and did not always correspond with the changes noted in the ATTD of EE and NDF. In general, GE digestibility was improved by supplementing TL to the low-fiber CSBM diet, had little effect when added to the insoluble fiber diets (i.e. DDGS or SH), but had a negative effect when supplemented to the BP-based diet. In contrast, ATTD of GE increased with SO inclusion in all diets, but to a greater extent in CSBM-, DDGS-, and SH-based diets compared to diets containing BP. Overall, the data indicated that fat digestibility is reduced more by feedstuffs with a high degree of insolubility (DDGS or SH) compared to a feedstuff with a high degree of solubility (BP). In addition, data from this experiment suggest that fat type interacts with fiber type and that the reduction in fat digestion is greater when a saturated fat is added to the diet compared to unsaturated fat sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.