ArticleNeuro-oncology2026
Scalable tracking of symptoms in the electronic health record using large language models in patients with central nervous system cancers undergoing therapy.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Symptom burden in young adult brain tumor survivors: Key intervention targets based on patient-reported outcome network analyses.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in large language models (LLMs) provide a means for scalable tracking of patient symptoms in clinical trials and post-marking surveillance using the electronic health record (EHR). Therefore, we sought to validate symptoms extracted from the EHR using a LLM to scale symptom extraction from the EHR.
methodsAcross a dataset of 499 randomly chosen clinical notes from patients seen in a neuro-oncology clinic, GPT-4o annotated symptoms (headache, fatigue, nausea, anxiety, difficulties sleeping, numbness and tingling, rash, constipation, and diarrhea) with an average sensitivity and specificity of 0.97 relative to expert manual review. We then applied the LLM to an external dataset of 51,541 notes representing 1,642 patients to obtain real-world symptom prevalence for temozolomide, bevacizumab, lomustine, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and methotrexate.
resultsIn the external dataset, the average number of symptoms per note was 3.92, and the most common symptom was fatigue (83% of patients). Surprisingly, patients receiving ICIs suffered from the most symptoms (mean = 4.68) and those receiving methotrexate had the least (mean = 2.92). We also found that the prevalence of reported symptoms in this real-world cohort was often much greater than the prevalence of reported symptoms in clinical trials of similar treatment regimens.
conclusionsLarge language models offer the ability to scale symptom extraction from health records, which is crucial to understand symptom burden and power symptom-related interventions and studies in real-world patient cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.