Evidence mapPaperPMID 40973987Full record

ReviewPrenatal diagnosis2026

The Expanding Role of Gene Sequencing in Shaping Fetal Therapies: Clinical and Ethical Considerations.

Matthew A Shear, Beltran Borges, Billie R Lianoglou, Tony Lum, Emma Canepa, Jennifer L Cohen, Julia E H Brown, Akos Herzeg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew A ShearCenter for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4134-5665
Beltran BorgesCenter for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-6730-0398
Billie R LianoglouCenter for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Tony LumCenter for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Emma CanepaCenter for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6979-2830
Jennifer L CohenDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0385-1025
Julia E H BrownCenter for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8724-693X
Akos HerzegCenter for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2061-4099

Funding

The Emergence of Prenatal Gene Therapy: An "Embedded Ethics" Ethnography investigating Clinical, Scientific and Societal ValuesR00HG012379 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · 2025 to 2025
$240k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG012379UCSF Center for Maternal Fetal Precision MedicineUS National Human Genome Research Institute 4R00HG012379-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In utero interventions are transformative in addressing genetic and anatomic conditions during fetal development. Next generation sequencing enables early genetic testing, playing a pivotal role in prenatal decision-making by supporting risk stratification, precise and timely diagnosis, which directly informs eligibility for fetal surgical and molecular therapies. Early diagnosis benefits both prenatal and postnatal care by guiding prenatal interventions, or selecting cases that might benefit from postnatal preparedness (when early postnatal treatment alters outcomes), and informing counseling (when it significantly influences pregnancy decision-making) and reproductive planning. The integration of artificial intelligence into prenatal care holds the promise of end-to-end solutions that streamline diagnosis, counseling, and access to both standard and experimental in utero interventions. However, significant ethical and social challenges remain, including equity in access to testing and care, incidental findings, variants of uncertain significance, incomplete penetrance and uncertain phenotype prediction of rare variants and disorders. These complexities raise important questions about reproductive autonomy and justice and responsible use of emerging technologies. This review emphasizes the intimate interplay between early genetic testing and in utero interventions, while highlighting the need for equitable, precise, and community-informed practices in prenatal genomic research and care.

Indexed as

Fetal TherapiesGenetic TestingPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleGenetic CounselingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40973987
PMCPMC13170067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.