ReviewPrenatal diagnosis2026
The Expanding Role of Gene Sequencing in Shaping Fetal Therapies: Clinical and Ethical Considerations.
Review in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Expanding Role of Gene Sequencing in Shaping Fetal Therapies: Clinical and Ethical Considerations.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In utero interventions are transformative in addressing genetic and anatomic conditions during fetal development. Next generation sequencing enables early genetic testing, playing a pivotal role in prenatal decision-making by supporting risk stratification, precise and timely diagnosis, which directly informs eligibility for fetal surgical and molecular therapies. Early diagnosis benefits both prenatal and postnatal care by guiding prenatal interventions, or selecting cases that might benefit from postnatal preparedness (when early postnatal treatment alters outcomes), and informing counseling (when it significantly influences pregnancy decision-making) and reproductive planning. The integration of artificial intelligence into prenatal care holds the promise of end-to-end solutions that streamline diagnosis, counseling, and access to both standard and experimental in utero interventions. However, significant ethical and social challenges remain, including equity in access to testing and care, incidental findings, variants of uncertain significance, incomplete penetrance and uncertain phenotype prediction of rare variants and disorders. These complexities raise important questions about reproductive autonomy and justice and responsible use of emerging technologies. This review emphasizes the intimate interplay between early genetic testing and in utero interventions, while highlighting the need for equitable, precise, and community-informed practices in prenatal genomic research and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.