ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
The protective power of social connectedness: Individual vs. community influences on psychological distress in middle-aged Black adults.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial connectedness is a crucial determinant of mental health, yet its effects on Black adults remain understudied, particularly in distinguishing between individual and community-level influences. This study examined cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between social connectedness and psychological distress among Black adults at the individual- and neighborhood (census tract) levels.
methodsUsing data from the MIDUS (Midlife in the United States) study, we analyzed 897 Black adults aged 25-74 from an urban setting. Social connectedness was measured across six dimensions: neighborhood social cohesion, social integration, support from family and friends, contribution to the community, and spirituality. After extensive model diagnostics, we employed cluster-robust errors to account for clustering by census tracts. We constructed cross-sectional and longitudinal models using these cluster-robust errors with inverse probability weighting to address attrition, examining individual and census-level effects on psychological distress in immediate and long-term contexts.
resultsIn 10-year longitudinal analyses, family support (β = -1.95, 95 % CI = -3.01, -0.90) and friend support (β = -1.09, 95 % CI = -1.66, -0.52) showed significant protective effects against psychological distress. Cross-sectional analyses confirmed protective relationships for neighborhood social cohesion (β = -2.19, 95 % CI = -3.10, -1.28), family support (β = -1.97, 95 % CI = -2.77, -1.16), and friend support (β = -0.74, 95 % CI = -1.40, -0.07). Census-level social connectedness measures were not significantly associated with psychological distress in longitudinal models.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the primacy of individual-level social connections in protecting against psychological distress among Black adults. Mental health interventions should prioritize strengthening personal and family-centered social support networks while incorporating community engagement components for long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.