ReviewBiomaterials2026
Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.
Review in Biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward 4D printed functional soft tissues.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Cutting-Edge Smart Hydrogel Platforms for Improved Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Three-tier framework for high-throughput biofabrication: Integrating 3D bioprinting, assistive platforms, and translational opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioprinting has been widely used to fabricate three-dimensional constructs for various applications. However, conventional bioprinting modalities face challenges such as low resolution, poor repeatability, limited speed, and scalability constraints. To overcome these limitations, unconventional bioprinting modalities have been actively developed, utilizing electric fields, acoustic waves, magnetic forces, light, smart materials, and microfluidics to advance bioprinted tissues. This Review explores various unconventional bioprinting modalities, which significantly improve upon conventional counterparts to create complex, scalable heterogenous tissue constructs. In addition, emerging bioprinting methods, utilizing the principles of conventional or unconventional bioprinting modalities with new concepts integrated, such as embedded bioprinting, cryobioprinting, microgravity bioprinting and 4D bioprinting, were discussed. Key applications include functional tissue engineering, disease modeling, and organoid development, with future directions focusing on artificial intelligence-driven bioprinting, multimodal biofabrication, and intraoperative bioprinting to improve scalability and clinical translation. By integrating interdisciplinary innovations, unconventional bioprinting offers new opportunities to advance tissue biofabrication technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.