SynthesisKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2025
Economic Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate economic aspect of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening strategies in developing countries. It focused on the cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) and telemedicine compared to standard care.
methodsA structured literature search was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies were included if they involved patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, conducted in low- or middle-income countries at the time of the study, compared AI or telemedicine-based intervention with standard care, and performed a health economic assessment or provided sufficient data to assess cost-effectiveness.
resultsSeven studies were identified from China, Thailand, Brazil, and India. Of these, four applied cost-utility analysis, two used cost-effectiveness analysis, and one employed both approaches. Three studies evaluated AI-based screening, three focused on telemedicine, and one examined a combined AI-assisted telemedicine model. All studies compared these interventions to standard care, with some using no screening as the comparator. Across all studies, AI and telemedicine-based screening strategies were found to be cost-effective, though the degree of economic benefit varied depending on the model, setting, and assumptions used.
conclusionsThis review supports the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of AI- and telemedicine-based DR screening in developing countries. While most strategies proved economically viable, cost savings and health gains varied. Screening frequency and patient compliance were key factors influencing successful implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.