ReviewJournal of food science2025
Plant-Based Analogs: Potential Chemical Risks & Mitigation Strategies.
Review in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plant-Based Analogs: Potential Chemical Risks & Mitigation Strategies.Journal of food science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meat, dairy, and egg analogs are products designed to mimic the structural and sensorial properties of their animal counterparts. These analogs have been developed to address diverse nutritional requirements, dietary preferences, and ethical considerations, resulting in a substantial net growth in market share in recent years. Nevertheless, concerns have been raised regarding their food safety and nutritional quality due to (a) the presence of natural toxicants and antinutritional factors in plant-based raw materials, (b) the incorporation of novel ingredients to achieve targeted sensory attributes, (c) the nature and intensity of processing required to develop these characteristics, and (d) the prioritization of sensory properties over nutritional value during product formulation. The potential short- and long-term food safety and nutritional implications of plant-based analogs are yet unknown. Consumers purchasing these products to attain their potential health and environmental benefits need to be presented with robust evidence regarding the inherent safety of their formulations and processes. This review examines the potential chemical hazards associated with plant-based alternatives, including naturally occurring toxins in plant-based ingredients and their residual presence in the final product, agrochemical and other environmental toxicants, novel ingredients and processing-derived compounds. It further highlights critical research gaps, including the need to identify potential chemical toxicants in plant-based analogs and to elucidate the long-term consequences of their consumption. Addressing these knowledge gaps will be essential in guiding industrial practices, regulations and policies aimed at ensuring that plant-based food products are both safe and nutritious for consumers and beneficial to the planet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.