ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2025
Analysis of Flexural Strength and Brittleness of a Polyjet 3D-Printed Denture Base Polymer.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical Anisotropy and Fatigue Behavior of 3D-Printed Dentures: A Comparison with CAD/CAM Milled Bases After Thermomechanical Aging.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- A Review of Current Systems, Materials, and Protocols for 3D-Printed Splints, Crowns, and Dentures.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- Analysis of Flexural Strength and Brittleness of a Polyjet 3D-Printed Denture Base Polymer.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study sought to understand the effects of print orientation on a novel 3D-printing technology recently made available for the fabrication of dentures. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 90 experimental samples (30 each at 0, 45, and 90 degrees) were printed using denture resin on a polyjet printer. The milled control samples (n = 10) were milled on a 5-axis dental laboratory mill from a denture base disc. 96 samples were tested for flexural strength and extension at break using a 3-point bend test on a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using statistical software and evaluated for statistical significance using general linear models with a Dunnett test with α = 0.05.
resultsThe results showed that the flexural strength and extension at break were both affected by print orientation with the 90-degree orientation being the lowest performing group for both properties. The 0-degree and 45-degree orientations both exceeded the ISO minimum flexural strength of 65 MPa, with mean flexural strengths of 88.18 and 73.53 MPa. The 90-degree group mean was well below the standard at 28.12 MPa. The milled sample group mean was 65.18 MPa. Extension at break showed similar results with less variation in the printed groups. Mean extension at break of the milled samples group was 15.05 mm, the 0-degree was 5.99 mm, 45-degree was 4.72 mm, and 90-degree was 1.92 mm.
conclusionFlexural strength and extension at break were influenced by print orientation. A 0-degree, or horizontal, print orientation yielded the highest values for flexural strength. The milled samples had significantly higher values for extension at break, but similar values for flexural strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.