Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977129›Full record

ArticleNutrition bulletin2025

What Is Known About the Fish Intake of People Living in Disadvantaged Communities in the UK? A Scoping Review.

Sarah Gale, Roseline Aboluwade, Louise Hunt, Clare Pettinger

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah GaleSchool of Health Professions, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Roseline AboluwadeSchool of Health Professions, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Louise HuntSchool of Health Professions, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Clare PettingerSchool of Health Professions, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-9463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish provides essential nutrients, including protein, omega-3 fatty acids (oily fish) and other micronutrients, and may be seen to have a prominent role in protecting against non-communicable diseases, especially cardiovascular disease. Recent UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey analysis suggests people are not meeting their weekly fish intake recommendation of at least two portions per week, of which one should be oily. Lower socioeconomic groups are more likely to eat poor-quality diets, with low fish intake, resulting in poor health outcomes. The aim of this scoping review was to examine the factors influencing fish consumption in people living within 'disadvantaged communities' in the UK. The review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) checklist. Peer-reviewed literature was searched, focusing on studies carried out in the UK (published in CINAHLPlus, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and MEDLINE) and grey literature (Google Scholar, consultations and websites) between January 2000 and December 2023. Selected studies were reviewed and analysed descriptively or using content analysis. A total of n = 26 papers were reviewed, with collated findings suggesting a nuanced picture in relation to fish intake within 'disadvantaged communities'. Specific barriers were identified, including physical and economic accessibility, with poor access to fish and the high cost of fish (especially oily) positively associated with income level. Demographic characteristics of age, gender, and ethnicity were shown to influence fish intake. Education level also plays a role, namely the higher the education level, the higher the likelihood of regular (i.e., weekly or daily depending on study) fish consumption. Similarly, cultural factors can determine fish-related food choices in adults, which can also influence children's fish intake. Despite some inherent limitations, this review provides important insights into the fish intake of disadvantaged communities. Recommendations are made for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers engaged in (blue) food system strategies to inform the design of interventions and campaigns to promote fish intake, enhance education of its health benefits, and skills in its preparation/cooking in disadvantaged communities to support action to tackle health inequalities.

Indexed as

DietFishesSeafoodVulnerable PopulationsAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdomblue food systemdisadvantaged communitiesfish intakehealth inequalitiessocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID40977129
PMCPMC12621167

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.