Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977148›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2025

Microstructural Hippocampal Alterations in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging.

Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh, Sadegh Ghaderi, Sana Mohammadi, Nahid Jashirenezhad, Farzad Fatehi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amir Mahmoud AhmadzadehDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-4283
Sadegh GhaderiNeuromuscular Research Center, Department of Neurology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-8826
Sana MohammadiNeuromuscular Research Center, Department of Neurology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2286-9052
Nahid JashirenezhadThe Persian Gulf Tropical Medicine Research Center, The Persian Gulf Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-4742
Farzad FatehiNeuromuscular Research Center, Department of Neurology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-7825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hippocampus is highly vulnerable in Alzheimer's disease (AD), with early microstructural changes potentially detectable via diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). Previous studies report promising DKI findings in AD, necessitating systematic evaluation. To compare hippocampal DKI metrics, particularly mean kurtosis (MK), between AD patients and healthy controls (HCs) and explore factors influencing these differences.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched until November 2024. Two reviewers independently extracted hippocampal MK values. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis employed random-effects models (STATA v17). Subgroup analyses (sex, age, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] parameters) and sensitivity and trim-and-fill assessments were conducted. Standardized mean difference (SMD), I

resultsTen studies (215 AD patients, 217 HCs; mean age: 65-75 years) using 3.0 T MRI were included. Eight articles were included in the meta-analysis to compare MK between groups. AD patients exhibited significantly reduced bilateral hippocampal MK compared to HCs (left: SMD = -1.32, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [-1.97 to -0.66]; right: SMD = -1.22 [-1.88 to -0.56]; both p < 0.001), indicating compromised microstructural complexity. Subgroup analyses revealed more pronounced MK reductions in studies with higher male ratios (>42%; left: SMD = -1.87; right: SMD = -1.91; p < 0.05). Age, echo time, repetition time, and diffusion directions did not significantly influence effect sizes. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, and publication bias was detected, but trim-and-fill analyses revealed no missing studies.

conclusionReduced hippocampal MK in AD reflects microstructural degeneration, with sex-related differences in effect magnitude.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDiffusion Tensor ImagingHippocampusAgedDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMaleAlzheimer's disease | biomarker | diffusion kurtosis imaging | hippocampus | mean kurtosis

Identifiers

PMID40977148
PMCPMC12451067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.