ReviewAnnals of botany2026
Gametocidal genes: biological mechanisms owing to hybrid dysgenesis in crop breeding, challenges and innovation.
Review in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate change and population growth are major threats to global food security. Many cultivated crops remain vulnerable due to reduced genetic variation. Wild relatives and diverse accessions of crop species are being used to reintroduce diversity into their genomes to help contend with these issues. However, in some species, notably Triticum aestivum, Oryza spp., Solanum lycopersicum, Zea mays and Nicotiana spp., Arabidopsis thaliana and their wild relatives, gamete-killing genes may be responsible for the occurrence of hybrid dysgenesis through the targeting of reproductive cells that do not contain the gene. SCOPE: This article explores gametocidal genes, 'pollen killers' or 'gamete killers', and toxin-antidote systems that result in sterility, alongside potential biological mechanisms. Gametocidal genes from wheat wild relatives significantly impact breeding programmes: wild relatives may contain useful germplasm but also gametocidal genes resulting in disastrous effects, including yield reductions. Due to their preferential transmission, gametocidal genes are extremely difficult to remove, therefore gene characterization is necessary. Hybrid sterility loci in Oryza spp. have been addressed, highlighting those that function similarly to gametocidal genes. We collate recent evidence to appraise the merit of biological mechanism hypotheses and suggest how recent innovations may improve characterization. Additionally, the challenges that they contribute to breeding programmes and subsequent successes are highlighted. In light of genetic innovation, we suggest contexts where a revival of using gametocidal genes may be beneficial, alongside novel techniques for research.
conclusionsPast research has identified unique characteristics of gametocidal genes, leading to theories such as the dual-mechanism and restriction-modification models to explain the mechanisms. However, recent research suggests that complex genetic factors such as transposable elements and epigenetics may account for the phenomenon. Future work towards mapping these genes is hopeful: innovations in sequencing, bioinformatics and genomic data have improved the ability to precisely identify the elusive gametocidal genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.