Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977669›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2025

Endoscopic management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

Yan Zeng, Jun-Wen Zhang, Jian Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan ZengDepartment of Psychology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Jun-Wen ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Jian YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. yj1984ren@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) represent a spectrum of heterogeneous lesions with diverse biological behaviors and malignant potential. This category encompasses relatively common subtypes, such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, serous cystic neoplasms, and mucinous cystic neoplasms, alongside relatively rarer entities, including cystic degeneration of solid pancreatic tumors. The widespread use of cross-sectional imaging has led to increased incidental detection of PCNs, subsequently driving a surge in PCN-related medical consultations and interventions; thus, standardized management of PCNs demands heightened attention. Continuous advancements in endoscopic technologies, particularly endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided procedures, now offer diversified diagnostic and therapeutic options, establishing EUS as a pivotal tool for diagnosing, surveillance, and treating PCNs. This review synthesizes current evidence and evolving clinical practices in the endoscopic management of PCNs, emphasizing optimizing preoperative diagnostic accuracy, standardizing endoscopic protocols, implementing subtype-specific risk stratification, promoting multidisciplinary team approaches, and addressing challenges in emerging technologies.

Indexed as

Endoscopic managementEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyEndoscopic ultrasoundMultidisciplinary teamPancreatic cystic neoplasmsRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40977669
PMCPMC12444257

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.