Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977763›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Public perception of medical detection dogs and other COVID-19 testing strategies.

Karolina Zacharias, Sebastian Meller, Nele A Ten Hagen, Holger A Volk, Friederike Twele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karolina ZachariasDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Sebastian MellerDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Nele A Ten HagenDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Holger A VolkDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Friederike TweleDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to social restrictions, severely impacting many sectors, including the cultural and gastronomic sectors. To restore normality, various testing approaches were proposed, but public opinion and acceptance of these tests in Germany had not been investigated. Proposed solutions included antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, and medical detection dogs. The aim of the current study was to assess public perceptions regarding the use of canines for SARS-CoV-2 detection. A feasibility study on SARS-CoV-2 detection using trained detection dogs was conducted among 2,802 concertgoers across four events. Participants aged 18 years and older, provided informed consent, shared their medical history, and completed a survey on various testing methods. They then underwent PCR testing, Ag-RDTs, and canine testing. After the concerts, 1,315 participants completed a follow-up survey about their experiences with the different testing systems. Before the concerts, 70% of respondents preferred using dogs for testing, with 32% favoring direct sniffing and 39% preferring sweat sample testing. After the concert, 72% still preferred canine testing, with 40% voting for direct sniffing and 32% for indirect sweat sample testing. Twenty-one percent preferred PCR testing before the concerts and 23% afterwards. Respondents also recommended deploying medical detection dogs at large events, such as concerts, and at transportation hubs. However, opinions were divided on their use for SARS-CoV-2 screening in schools. These results underscore the importance of context-specific testing strategies and standardized guidelines for canine detection. While many participants preferred direct sniffing, the sweat sample method emerged as a more practical and privacy-conscious alternative. The study provides valuable insights into public acceptance of various testing methods and emphasizes the potential of canine testing at large events. Clear guidelines and proper training of detection dogs will be crucial for future pandemic preparedness.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingPublic OpinionAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsDogsFeasibility StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesantigen rapid testsCOVID-19medical detection dogsopinion surveypandemic preparednesspolymerase chain reactionSARS-CoV-2 detection

Identifiers

PMID40977763
PMCPMC12443801

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.