ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Brain's geometries for movements and beauty judgments. A contribution of topos geometries.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a theory on the neural basis of aesthetic experience, and judgment of beauty. It is based on both empirical facts concerning brain mechanisms and theoretical mathematical theories. We first recall previous evidence that the brain uses several non-Euclidian geometries for perception and action at different scales of space (personal, peri-personal, near locomotor, environmental, imaginative). This is supported by neuroscience data (brain imaging, neuropsychology, movement control, etc.). For example, the movement of drawing obeys specific kinematic rules, that reflect the control by Euclidian and affine geometries. We already formulated the corresponding geometries in brain's networks by using Topos and Stacks theory of the mathematician Alexander Grothendieck. The present article extends the previous proposals by suggesting that a meta-geometry provides the binding between these specialized geometries, by using known higher structures and dynamics (like n-Topos and n-Stacks) for joint perceptions and movements, and other modalities, as concepts, memories or emotions, at different spatial scales domains. We suggest that a form, an object, a movement, an environment, an event, an idea, is perceived as beautiful if the data provided by the senses and programs are embedded in these higher geometries, providing a sort of dynamic recognition, through relations of generalized proportions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.