Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978335›Full record

ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2025

Enhanced recovery after liver transplantation-a prospective analysis focusing on quality assessment.

Xiaodong Yuan, Jiwei Qin, Hao Zheng, Can Qi, Yafei Guo, Zebin Zhu, Wei Wu, Zhijun Xu, Xuefeng Li, Ning Wang and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. World journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Xiaodong YuanThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Jiwei QinThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Hao ZhengThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Can QiThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Yafei GuoThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Zebin ZhuThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Wei WuThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Zhijun XuThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Xuefeng LiThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Ning WangThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Xiaoqing ChaiDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Yanhu XieDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Xiaogen TaoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Haihua LiuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Weiyong LiuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Guoyan LiuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Lei YeDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Kexue DengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Xuebing JiDepartment of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Changlong HouDepartment of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Zhiqin YaoOrgan Procurement Organization, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Qiang HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Ruipeng SongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Shugeng ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Jizhou WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Lianxin LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Björn NashanThe Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of the USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal approach for almost all types of surgical procedures, including liver transplantation (LTx). We developed an ERAS protocol for LTx based on previous experience and assessed it using benchmarks from the German Institute for Quality Management and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG). Methods: An ERAS protocol was developed and implemented in our center since 2018 for LTx, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative procedures. From January 2021 to December 31st 2022, we conducted a prospective analysis including donor and recipient demographics, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and medical history. Perioperative management, such as operative time, anhepatic phase time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, morbidity and mortality as well as postoperative hospitalization, readmission and 1-year patient survival, were collected as outcome measures. Results: Sixty-eight consecutive liver transplant recipients were included. Mean age of the donors was 47 (36-55.5) years old, type of donation was in 41 donation after brain death (DBD), 26 donation after controlled circulatory death (DCD) and 1 donation after brain and cardiac death (DBCD). Mean age of the patients was 49.6 years (range, 26-68 years), 81% were male. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the recipients was 24 kg/m Conclusions: We developed an ERAS protocol in LTx, consisting of preoperative, perioperative and postoperative management and assessed the quality using benchmarks from IQTIG. Our study revealed that the proposed ERAS approach in LTx is feasible offering the opportunities of enhanced recovery and quality management.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)IQTIG benchmarksliver transplantation (LTx)quality management

Identifiers

PMID40978335
PMCPMC12443639

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.