ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Nasal cells as a bronchial cell surrogate for pre-clinical assessment of drug response in cystic fibrosis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-derived airway cell cultures are used in personalized medicine strategies for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) to predict potential clinical response to cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drugs. While bronchial epithelial cells from lung explants (HBEx) are the gold standard for CFTR functional measurements, nasal epithelial cells (HNE) are a more practical tissue source resulting in widespread use for preclinical functional platforms. HNE have so far not been rigorously validated against the gold standard for this purpose. In this study, we collected nasal and bronchial cells, and lung explants from pwCF undergoing lung transplantation as well as non-CF controls. Comparative studies in non-CF cells showed that while CFTR-mediated transepithelial currents in HNE underestimated those in HBEx, the magnitude of the CFTR modulator response was similar between CF HNE, brushed HBE (HBEb), and HBEx with significant correlation between matched HNE and HBEb from 16 pwCF. These findings confirm use of HNE as surrogate of bronchial airway for preclinical drug testing with report of drug responses in relation to the tissue-specific non-CF or baseline controls rather than as absolute results. Furthermore, CF centres offering HNE-based drug testing utilize different techniques, challenging the comparison of results between centres. We show how culture media, use of fresh or freeze-thawed cells as well as difference in Ussing technique impact the magnitude of measured CFTR function, which is why we suggest diligence in reporting of these factors when presenting CFTR modulator drug response results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.