Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978773›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

A comprehensive review of crop stress detection: destructive, non-destructive, and ML-based approaches.

Aman Muhammad, Zahid Ullah Khan, Javed Khan, Abdul Sattar Mashori, Aamir Ali, Nida Jabeen, Ziqi Han, Fuzhong Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aman MuhammadCollege of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong, China.
Zahid Ullah KhanCollege of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China.
Javed KhanDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Bannu, Pakistan.
Abdul Sattar MashoriCollege of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong, China.
Aamir AliCollege of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong, China.
Nida JabeenSchool of Communications and Information Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, China.
Ziqi HanSchool of Software, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong, China.
Fuzhong LiSchool of Software, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture stands as a foundational element of life, closely linked to the progress and development of society. Both humans and animals depend on agriculture for a wide range of essential services, such as producing oxygen and food, along with vital raw materials for clothing, medicine, and other necessities. Given agriculture's vital role in supporting individual well-being and driving global progress, protecting and ensuring the long-term sustainability of agriculture is essential. This is crucial for securing resources and maintaining environmental balance for future generations. In this context, in our review we have examined the various factors that can interfere with the normal physiological and developmental functions of plants and crops. These factors, referred to scientifically as stressors or stress conditions, include a wide range of both biotic and abiotic challenges. In this work we have systematically addressed all the major categories of stress that plants may encounter throughout their lifecycle. Additionally, because plants tend to exhibit recognizable physiological or biochemical responses to stress, we have cataloged the associated stress indicators. These indicators were identified through various assessment techniques, including both destructive and non-destructive approaches. A significant advancement highlighted in our review is the integration of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms with non-destructive methodologies, which has substantially enhanced the accuracy, scalability, and real-time capability of plant stress detection. These ML-enhanced systems leverage high-dimensional data acquired through remote sensing modalities, such as hyperspectral imaging, thermal imaging, and chlorophyll fluorescence. These ultimately help in enabling the early identification of biotic and abiotic stress signatures. Through advanced pattern recognition, feature extraction, and predictive modeling, ML facilitates proactive anomaly detection and stress forecasting, thereby mitigating yield losses and supporting data-driven precision agriculture. This convergence represents a significant step toward intelligent, automated crop monitoring systems. Finally, we conclude the article with a concise discussion of the potential positive roles that certain stress conditions may play in enhancing plant resilience and productivity.

Indexed as

crop stress typesdestructive analysis techniquesmachine learning analysisnon-destructive analysis techniquesstress analysis

Identifiers

PMID40978773
PMCPMC12447170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.