ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Tomato seedling stem and leaf segmentation method based on an improved ResNet architecture.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The phenotypic traits of tomato plants reflect their growth status, and investigating these characteristics can improve tomato production. Traditional deep learning models face challenges such as excessive parameters, high complexity, and susceptibility to overfitting in point cloud segmentation tasks. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a lightweight improved model based on the ResNet architecture. Methods: The proposed network optimizes the traditional residual block by integrating bottleneck modules and downsampling techniques. Additionally, by combining curvature features and geometric characteristics, we custom-designed specialized convolutional layers to enhance segmentation accuracy for tomato stem and leaf point clouds. The model further employs adaptive average pooling to improve generalization and robustness. Results: Experimental validation demonstrated that the optimized model achieved a training accuracy of 95.11%, a 3.26% improvement over the traditional ResNet18 model. Testing time was reduced to 4.02 seconds (25% faster than ResNet18's 5.37 seconds). Phenotypic parameter extraction yielded high correlation with manual measurements, with coefficients of determination (R²) of 0.941 (plant height), 0.752 (stem diameter), 0.945 (leaf area), and 0.943 (leaf inclination angle). The root mean square errors (RMSE) were 0.506, 0.129, 0.980, and 3.619, respectively, while absolute percentage errors (APE) remained below 6% (1.965%-5.526%). Discussion: The proposed X-ResNet model exhibits superior segmentation performance, demonstrating high accuracy in phenotypic trait extraction. The strong correlations and low errors between extracted and manually measured data validate the feasibility of 3D point cloud technology for tomato phenotyping. This study provides a valuable benchmark for plant phenotyping research, with significant practical and theoretical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.