Evidence mapPaperPMID 40978952Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Efficacy of Oral Dydrogesterone in Improving Neonatal Birth Weight Outcomes in Idiopathic Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Prospective Observational Study.

Nadira Kasi, Naseeb Nama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadira KasiObstetrics and Gynaecology, Sandeman Provisional Hospital, Quetta, Quetta, PAK.
Naseeb NamaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Sandeman Provisional Hospital, Quetta, Quetta, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) represents a significant obstetric complication with substantial global prevalence, with idiopathic cases constituting a considerable proportion where conventional therapeutic interventions demonstrate limited efficacy. Progesterone analogues have emerged as potential therapeutic agents for managing pregnancy-related complications, though evidence regarding their specific application in idiopathic IUGR remains limited. This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral dydrogesterone supplementation in improving neonatal birth weight outcomes among pregnant women diagnosed with idiopathic IUGR compared to conventional treatment modalities. Methodology A prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta, over a six-month period from October 16, 2015, to April 15, 2016. The study enrolled 46 pregnant women aged 18-35 years with singleton pregnancies presenting at 28-34 weeks of gestation and diagnosed with idiopathic IUGR. Participants were allocated into two groups using a lottery method: Group A received conventional treatment comprising iron, folic acid supplementation, complete bed rest, and a high-protein diet, while Group B received identical conventional treatment plus oral dydrogesterone 10 mg twice daily for a minimum of four weeks or until delivery. The primary outcome measure was neonatal birth weight assessed within the first hour of delivery by trained nursing staff using calibrated scales. Results The study demonstrated statistically significant improvement in mean neonatal birth weight in the dydrogesterone group compared to conventional treatment, with mean birth weights of 2.10±0.19 kg versus 1.60±0.22 kg, respectively, representing a clinically meaningful difference of 0.50 kg with p<0.001. The dydrogesterone intervention achieved a 31.3% relative increase in birth weight outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed consistent therapeutic benefits across all demographic stratifications, including age groups 18-23 years (2.08±0.21 kg versus 1.60±0.29 kg, p=0.016), 24-29 years (2.06±0.16 kg versus 1.64±0.22 kg, p<0.001), and 30-35 years (2.18±0.23 kg versus 1.62±0.20 kg, p<0.001). Parity analysis demonstrated significant improvements in primiparous (2.06±0.18 kg versus 1.65±0.23 kg, p<0.001), multiparous (2.15±0.23 kg versus 1.61±0.20 kg, p<0.001), and grand multiparous participants (2.15±0.07 kg versus 1.60±0.14 kg, p=0.039). Treatment success rate, defined as achieving a birth weight greater than 2.0 kg, was 91.3% (n=21) in the dydrogesterone group compared to 13.0% (n=3) in conventional treatment (p<0.001). Safety analysis revealed excellent tolerability with minimal adverse events reported in 8.7% (n=2) of dydrogesterone recipients. Conclusion Oral dydrogesterone supplementation demonstrates significant therapeutic efficacy in improving neonatal birth weight outcomes in idiopathic IUGR with an excellent safety profile. The substantial birth weight improvement of 0.50 kg supports potential integration into evidence-based clinical protocols for this challenging obstetric condition, warranting further large-scale randomized controlled trials for definitive clinical validation.

Indexed as

birth weightdydrogesteronefetal growth retardationpregnancy complicationsprogesteroneprospective studiestreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID40978952
PMCPMC12447364

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.