Evidence mapPaperPMID 40979314Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025

Perceived need to prevent stroke readmission: A qualitative study from the perspective of stroke patients and healthcare professionals.

Mohammad Rajabpour, Kavian Ghandehari, Amir Mirhaghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad RajabpourStudent Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Kavian GhandehariDepartment of Neurology, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Amir MirhaghiMidwifery and Nursing Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke readmission poses a significant challenge for both stroke patients (SPs) and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing stroke readmission is crucial in empowering individuals to leverage supportive resources. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of HCPs and SPs regarding the modifiable factors influencing stroke readmission. MATERIALS AND

methodThis qualitative study employed in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 30 participants selected through purposeful sampling from October 2023 to January 2024. An interview guide featuring open-ended questions about stroke readmission experiences was utilized for data collection. The interviews were continued until data saturation was achieved. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and subjected to directed content analysis.

resultsThe modifiable factors influencing stroke readmission were categorized into five generic categories: (1) knowledge deficit about the disease, (2) self-forgetfulness physical care, (3) food swamp, (4) high-risk behaviors, and (5) psychological distress.

conclusionAccording to the results of this study, by identifying the modifiable risk factors associated with stroke readmission, health stakeholders can design comprehensive preventive educational programs to address these needs.

Indexed as

Hospital readmissionqualitative researchrisk factorstroke

Identifiers

PMID40979314
PMCPMC12448509

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.