ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2025
Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on improving mental health outcomes in adolescents with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review protocol.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychological Distress and Health-Related Quality of Life in Romanian Adults with Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression and anxiety are among the most common mental health outcomes experienced by young individuals with type 2 diabetes. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been proven to be an effective intervention for depression and anxiety. This review shall summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of CBT for depression and/or anxiety among adolescents with type 2 diabetes. This systematic review aims to summarize evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy compared to treatment as usual or no treatment on improving depression and anxiety in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. To be included in the review, a study design must be used to test the effectiveness of CBT on depression and/or anxiety in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Also, studies must be published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language between 2014 and 2023. Studies examining the effectiveness of CBT for conditions other than depression and/or anxiety shall be excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and guideline checklist (2020) shall be used to select studies for this systematic review. A comprehensive search shall be conducted on electronic databases such as APAPsycINFO, APA PsycARTICLES, CINAHL, and MEDLINE to identify studies that fit the selection criteria. Data to be extracted for analysis shall include the study aim, sample, research design, intervention modality, comparators, and outcomes. Two independent authors shall perform data extraction. An acceptable checklist for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies will be used to assess the quality of the studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.