ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025
Framework for standardized genetic testing recommendations for chronic kidney disease in Ontario.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic Kidney Disease in Children with Suspected Genetic Etiology: Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- The Importance of Molecular Testing in the Diagnosis of Genetic Syndromes with Chronic Kidney Disease: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the Evolving Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Adult Glomerulonephritis Guidelines.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Genetic causes account for 10% to 20% of adult and 30% to 50% of pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with genetic CKD have a higher risk of progression to kidney failure. More than 500 genes are implicated in kidney disease; yet, Ontario's existing gene panel options includes fewer than 45 genes. Despite growing evidence for genetic testing in CKD care, testing is not systematically integrated into the diagnostic pathway. Standardized testing and clear eligibility criteria are needed to improve diagnosis, care, and outcomes. Methods: In 2023, Ontario Health's Provincial Genetics Program convened a Renal Genetics Expert Group to develop standardized genetic testing criteria and evidence-based multigene panels for CKD. This initiative aims to support equitable access to high-quality genetic services and improve clinical outcomes through early, accurate diagnoses. Results: An environmental scan of provincial, national, and international guidelines informed the development of a testing framework. Literature review and expert consensus guided the creation of eligibility criteria and panel content. Input from nephrologists, geneticists, genetic counsellors, and patients was incorporated throughout the process. Conclusion: Standardized recommendations for genetic testing in CKD promote consistent, equitable access to diagnostics across Ontario. Careful curation of multigene panels that align with current knowledge of gene-disease associations and patient phenotypes, can help streamline testing. Integration of this framework into clinical care will strengthen collaboration between nephrology and genetics, facilitate earlier diagnosis, and support personalized management, ultimately improving outcomes for individuals with CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.