ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial on the contributions of vitamin D in the control of cardiovascular risk factors, depressive symptoms and suicide risk.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the contributions of vitamin D supplementation to the control of cardiovascular risk factors and the treatment of depressive symptoms, including suicide risk. Methods: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted with 224 adults (18-61 years) diagnosed with major depressive disorder, recruited from psychiatric clinics of two universities in Northeast Brazil. Participants were randomized to receive vitamin D supplementation (50,000 IU/week; Results: Vitamin D supplementation significantly increased serum concentrations to adequate physiological levels and led to marked reductions in depressive symptoms ( Strengths and limitations: Strengths include the rigorous double-blind, randomized design, probabilistic sampling, and comprehensive clinical-laboratory evaluation. Limitations involve the single-region sample, lack of long-term follow-up after supplementation, and the exclusion of patients with severe comorbidities, which may limit generalizability. Conclusion: Weekly administration of 50,000 IU of vitamin D for six months proved effective in reducing depressive symptoms and suicide risk while improving cardiovascular health markers, highlighting its promise as an accessible, low-cost adjunctive therapy in psychiatric and primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.