ReviewiLIVER2025
Debates and progress in the management of intermediate-stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma.
Review in iLIVER, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Transarterial chemoembolisation-based combination therapy as a potential new standard for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the targeted immunotherapy era.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Pregnancy and Assisted Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Sjögren Syndrome and Antiphospholipid Syndrome: An Umbrella Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Analysis of risk factors and prediction of prognosis in patients with primary liver cancer undergoing transarterial chemoembolization.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization improves tumor response and survival compared with conventional TACE in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the global incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the rise, precise staging has become critical for guiding treatment decisions and improving long-term outcomes. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, widely used for HCC classification, incorporates factors such as Child-Pugh A or B liver function, tumor size and number, absence of cancer-related symptoms, and lack of vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis. For intermediate-stage HCC, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains the globally recommended standard. However, the substantial heterogeneity in tumor burden and liver function among patients means that not all individuals benefit equally from TACE. As a result, a uniform treatment approach is insufficient. Preserving liver function is now recognized as equally important as achieving high objective response rates, with the ultimate goal of prolonging overall survival. In response, researchers have proposed advanced stratification methods for stage B HCC to optimize therapeutic outcomes. While these stratification criteria remain under debate, there is a growing shift from TACE-centric strategies toward personalized targeted therapies for specific subpopulations. This review explores advanced stratification concepts, evaluates corresponding treatment strategies, analyzes ongoing clinical trials, and assesses their potential to transform the management of intermediate-stage HCC-while also outlining future directions for its treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.