Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979622›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2025

Analysis of Cross-Border Movement of Cattle in Yunnan Province, China: Insights Into Transboundary Animal Diseases Control.

Dai Meixia, Yi Ying, Tang Hao, Liu Hanze, Yang Honglin, Li Chao, Shen Chaojian, Zhang Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Genomic phylogenetic characterization ofBiosafety and health · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dai MeixiaInstitute of Zoonosis, College of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0283-6358
Yi YingQingdao Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Tang HaoBiosecurity and One Health Research Centre, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3932-4016
Liu HanzeChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yang HonglinChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Li ChaoChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shen ChaojianChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1068-0575
Zhang YiInstitute of Zoonosis, College of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2051-2684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to the unique geographical location of Yunnan province in China, cross-border animal movement has historically been frequent. To get the routing and amount of cross-border animal movement and assess the impact of border control infrastructures on animal movement and potentially disease transmission, a cross-sectional study was conducted in the border areas of Yunnan province from August to October 2023. Epidemiological survey data showed that the smuggled cattle came from Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, India, Bengal, Sri Lanka, and other countries, and then the cattle were cross-border transported through different county, and by several different pathways. Due to the isolating devices on the border and narrowing price gap, the volume of cross-border animal movements sharply decreased compared to that before the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of the smuggled cattle were sold to the southern provinces of China, a proportion of them were short-term fattened locally. In the process of cross-border and domestic transport, the practice of no disinfection of the transport vehicle and ship and mixing of cattle from different origins were high-risk practices for disease transmission. In the livestock market, no cleaning and disinfection, sharing forage and cattle sheds, high density of people, vehicle, and cattle may accelerate disease transmission. This survey and analysis may serve as a foundation for risk control and intervention strategies of transboundary animal disease.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesCOVID-19AnimalsCattleChinaCross-Sectional StudiesTransportationcattleChinacross-border animal movementrisk managementSoutheast Asiatransboundary animal diseases

Identifiers

PMID40979622
PMCPMC12446582

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.