ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Exosomes: the future of acellular nanotherapeutics in regenerative vascularization.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exosome and biotherapeutic strategies for dermatological and oncological skin complications.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Trace element-dictated exosome modules and self-adaptive dual-network hydrogel orchestrate diabetic foot regeneration through complement-mitochondria-autophagy circuitry.Military Medical Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ischemic disorders represent the world's leading cause of morbidity and mortality and can emanate from pathology in both the macrovasculature and microvasculature. Current treatment options for macrovascular disease include surgical bypass, endovascular intervention, thrombolytic drugs, and pharmacologics (vasodilators). However, when ischemia occurs at the microvascular level, conventional vascular surgical approaches are typically not feasible. In this setting, complex reconstructive surgery may be warranted, especially if concurrent open wounds are present. Thus, new pro-angiogenic treatment strategies that facilitate microvascular regenerative vascularization and wound repair are welcome. Methods: We present a comprehensive overview of both stem cell-derived and mature-cell-derived exosomes in the context of regenerative vascularization and wound repair, focusing on cargo mechanisms and biomaterial delivery strategies. We also highlight how materials science will be instrumental to both therapeutic delivery and development of fully acellular pro-angiogenic bioengineered exosomes. All cited studies involving exosomes complied with the International Society of Extracellular Vesicles guidelines. To assess the clinical relevance and gaps, we visited clinicaltrials.gov, where keywords "exosome" and "vascular" were searched. Other parameters such as completion status, country, and exosome type further refined our search. Results: Exosomes were found to promote angiogenesis and improved wound healing outcomes primarily Conclusion: Therapies utilizing exosomes as an acellular approach to regenerative vascularization are promising, though challenges with scalability remain. Further mechanistic understanding, standardization, and controlled trials are compulsory prior to widespread human application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.