Evidence mapPaperPMID 40979656Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025

Palliative care professionals' perceptions of their skills and the implementability of evidence-based bereavement care guidance: A cross-sectional survey study.

Sina Gyarmathy, Marco Riguzzi, Rahel Naef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sina GyarmathyZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7220-2156
Marco RiguzziInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-351X
Rahel NaefInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Bereavement support is recommended in specialised palliative care, but it is often underdeveloped. This study assessed palliative care professionals' (PCPs') skills in family care, their attitudes towards evidence-based practices, and their perceptions of a new, evidence-based bereavement care guidance before its implementation. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between September and December 2023 in specialised palliative care services in two Swiss hospitals. Seven validated instruments were used to assess PCPs' skills in family care (FNPS, EPCS, and ICS-Nurse), attitudes towards evidence-based practices (EBP-B), and perception of a newly developed, evidence-based bereavement care guidance (acceptability AIM, appropriateness IAM, feasibility FIM). The data were analysed using descriptive and nonparametric methods. Results: The 39 participants (response 63%; 28 nurses, 6 physicians, 5 others) rated their skills in family care as high (median ⩾75% of scale range) and had an open attitude towards evidence-based practices (median 64%). They perceived the bereavement care guidance as highly acceptable and appropriate (median 75%) and rather feasible (median 68%). A more favourable attitude towards evidence-based practices was associated with higher perceived acceptability (Spearman's rho, Conclusion: This study shows that PCPs rate their skills in working with families at the end of life as high and perceive evidence-based bereavement care as implementable. An open attitude towards evidence-based practices supports more favourable perceptions of new bereavement care guidance before its implementation.

Indexed as

bereavementdeathevidence-based practicesfamilyhealthcare staffhospitalimplementationpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID40979656
PMCPMC12444063

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.