ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Distribution of coronary artery calcium in a large European all-comer population referred for cardiac imaging.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Highlights recently published in the International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature on sex differences in cardiovascular disease diagnosis and management.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is a well-established surrogate marker of atherosclerotic plaque burden and is highly valuable for risk stratification. However, contemporary data on the distribution of CACS across age and sex is lacking, particularly for European countries and quantified by multi-slice CT. We assessed predictors of CACS and provide granular age- and sex-specific reference values derived from a real-world clinical population referred for cardiac imaging. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study examined patients clinically referred for non-invasive cardiac imaging from May 2013 to May 2024. Patients without coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy, cardiac surgery or intervention, renal or hepatic failure were included. Multiple linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of CACS, and predictor importance was calculated. CACS percentiles were then calculated for both sexes and stratified across nine age groups. Results: The final population consisted of 18'225 individuals (39.6 % women; 60.8 % symptomatic). Age and sex were the most influential predictors of CACS, accounting for 69 % and 18 % relative predictor importance, respectively. Men exhibited a significantly higher median CACS than women (59 [IQR 1-338] vs. 10 [IQR 0-129], Conclusions: This study provides contemporary age- and sex-based CAC score reference values, as observed in a large European real-world cohort referred for cardiac imaging. Age and sex exhibit the most relevant impact on expected CAC scores, while other conventional risk factors appear to be less important. Our results enable improved classification regarding the coronary calcium burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.