Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40979699›Full record

ArticleDigital health

The role of AI in the diagnosis of speech and language disorders: A systematic mapping study.

Dina Tbaishat, Rand Al-Shafei, Mohammed Odeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dina TbaishatCollege of Technological Innovation, Zayed University, Dubai, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8029-9716
Rand Al-ShafeiGlobal Academy for Digital Health, Bristol, UK.
Mohammed OdehGlobal Academy for Digital Health, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to fulfill the current research gap pertaining to the lack of a comprehensive systematic mapping study (SMS) regarding the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning algorithms in the diagnosis of speech and language disorders (SLDs), and the extent to which such AI algorithms can automate this diagnostic process. Methods: An SMS has been implemented following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines; 19,774 research papers were screened resulting in 70 studies meeting purposely designed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The findings revealed multiple research gaps including substantial divide in the application of AI machine learning algorithms for diagnosing SLDs, where 91.43% versus 8.57% of the studies relating to SLDs, respectively. This is further exacerbated by the absence AI machine learning algorithms for diagnosing prevalent language disorders, such as developmental language disorders in children. Furthermore, most AI machine learning algorithms for diagnosing SLDs are focused on binary classification of these disorders, for example, healthy and pathological voices, but not providing detailed diagnostics, such as the impaired aspects and contextual SLDs severity. Finally, AI machine learning algorithms have predominantly focused on partially automating the SLD assessment phase of the diagnostic process (76%) compared to those that have extended the automation to partially include the diagnosis determination phase (24%). Conclusion: The effectiveness of AI machine learning algorithms in automating SLD diagnosis cannot be claimed without larger population datasets, highlighting a research gap for developing AI models to automate the four phases of the SLD diagnostic process and link them to treatment protocols in clinical settings.

Indexed as

AI algorithmslanguage disorderPRISMASLDSLD diagnosisSLD severitySLD treatmentspeech disordersystematic mapping study

Identifiers

PMID40979699
PMCPMC12446814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.