ArticleThe journal of Tehran Heart Center2024
Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl for Ischemic Cardiovascular Events.
Article in The journal of Tehran Heart Center, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Icosapent ethyl (IPE) has demonstrated efficacy and safety in reducing the risk of ischemic cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to systematically gather and synthesize existing cost-effectiveness analyses of IPE combined with statin therapy for cardiovascular risk reduction in primary and secondary prevention settings. Methods: Comprehensive electronic searches were conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database to identify relevant literature (up to May 2024). From an initial pool of 580 studies, 11 met the predefined inclusion criteria. Results: The findings demonstrated that IPE significantly decreased hospitalization and mortality rates compared to standard treatments. The study indicated that IPE provided greater quality-adjusted life years and life-years gained than statin therapy alone. However, IPE is more expensive than conventional medications, such as statins. For instance, the 1-year cost of IPE is $3768 in Australia and $3497 in the United States per patient. Additionally, the results revealed that the threshold for assessing the effectiveness of IPE ranged from $50,000 to $150,000 in the United States and AUD 50,000 ($39,000) in Australia. Conclusion: Based on the current study, IPE is cost-effective, with a higher probability of cost-effectiveness in patients undergoing secondary prevention than those in primary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.