Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980284›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Dissipation, metabolism, processing factors and risk assessment of pesticides in peaches from field cultivation to crisp processing.

Kai Cui, Liping Fang, Ruiyan Ding, Rui Ni, Shuai Guan, Jingyun Liang, Teng Li, Junhua Liu, Jian Wang, Zhan Dong and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kai CuiInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Liping FangInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Ruiyan DingInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Rui NiInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Shuai GuanInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Jingyun LiangInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Teng LiInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Junhua LiuInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Jian WangInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Zhan DongInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohu WuInstitute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China.
Yongquan ZhengInstitute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticide residues in peach crisps, a daily leisure snack, are insufficiently investigated. This study comprehensively explored the dissipation, metabolism, processing factors (PFs) and risk assessment of 15 commonly used pesticides in peaches from field cultivation to crisp processing. Field trial results suggest that the half-lives of the surveyed pesticides were 3.40-10.05 days in peaches. Furthermore, the metabolites clothianidin and trifloxystrobin acid were detected at concentrations of 4.28-39.79 μg/kg. All pesticide residues became concentrated in the peach crisps after freeze-drying (PF: 1.34-4.80). Contrarily, peeling and washing removed varying amounts of pesticide residues from peaches (PF: 0.076-1.24, most <1). Notably, the octanol-water partition coefficient exhibited a significant positive correlation with the crisp PFs. Dietary risk assessment results indicated that chronic and acute health risks were considered to be within acceptable limits for children and the general population. The results provide important references for promoting healthy consumption of peaches and peach crisps.

Indexed as

PeachPeach crispsPesticide residueProcessing factorRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40980284
PMCPMC12445690

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.