Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40980448›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

A randomized controlled trial of a telehealth group cognitive intervention (LaTCH-BRAINS) to improve cognition after primary brain tumor diagnosis.

Kerryn E Pike, Sian E B Virtue-Griffiths, Rachel Campbell, Dianne M Legge, Katarzyna Lion, Carl I Moller, Tamara Ownsworth, Mark B Pinkham, Louise Saliba, Ursula M Sansom-Daly and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kerryn E PikeJohn Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe University, Wodonga, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0474-1215
Sian E B Virtue-GriffithsDepartment of Psychology, Counselling & Therapy, School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5588-0731
Rachel CampbellPsycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5013-8361
Dianne M LeggeCurtin School of Nursing/Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4492-4112
Katarzyna LionThe Hopkins Centre, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3699-6896
Carl I MollerThe Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2065-0997
Tamara OwnsworthThe Hopkins Centre, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-7094
Mark B PinkhamUniversity of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8886-728X
Louise SalibaMonash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Ursula M Sansom-DalyBehavioural Sciences Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Randwick Clinical Campus, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-8900
Dean VuksanovicDepartment of Psychology, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8887-7653
Joanne ShawPsycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-7066
Haryana M DhillonPsycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4039-5169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cognitive changes are common following primary brain tumor (PBT), impacting employment, independence, relationships, and quality of life (QoL). Despite this, tailored cognitive interventions are unavailable within Australia. The La Trobe and Caulfield Hospital (LaTCH) group cognitive rehabilitation program has demonstrated efficacy for older adults without PBT. Efficacy for people with PBT was examined using a telehealth adaption of LaTCH. Methods: A Type 1 hybrid-implementation design randomized controlled trial (RCT) with waitlist control (WLC) was used. Adults > 3-months post-PBT diagnosis, and > 1-month post-radiation were randomized to (1) Intervention [6-week group sessions; 2 hours/week], delivered over Zoom ( Results: Sixty participants ( Conclusions: Telehealth-delivered LaTCH-BRAINS improved subjective memory-related outcomes for people with PBT, demonstrating promise as a cognitive rehabilitation approach for people with PBT reporting memory decline. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN 12622000189729p), registered on 03/02/2022 (Appendix A).

Indexed as

brain cancercognitive rehabilitationglioblastomagliomatelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40980448
PMCPMC12448700

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.