ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Direct inference of haplotypes from sequencing data.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Haplotypes are crucial for various genetic analyses, but reconstructing haplotypes from sequencing data remains a significant challenge. Current methods for haplotype reconstruction typically rely on a procedure of two separated stages, variant calling and phasing, but phasing overlooks the errors in variant calling. Additionally, the complexity of haplotype reconstruction increases with the number of homologous chromosomes in the sample, a common scenario in polyploid species or cell mixture sequencing. Results: To address the challenges above, we propose a unified probabilistic framework that directly utilizes sequencing reads to estimate haplotypes and sequencing error profiles. Rather than focusing solely on variant loci used by traditional phasing methods, our approach models all loci covered by any sequencing read to enhance the estimation of error profiles in sequencing data, thereby increasing the statistical power of haplotype inference, especially for low-coverage datasets. Evaluations on both simulated and real sequencing data demonstrate the superior performance of our method, particularly in scenarios characterized by high sequencing error rates, low coverage, or polyploidy. Availability and implementation: Related codes and dataset can be found at: https://github.com/new-zbc/DIHap.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.