ArticleEvolution letters2025
Evolutionary trends in the emergence of skeletal cell types.
Article in Evolution letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The regulatory significance of chondrocyte hypertrophy in maintaining chondrocyte homeostasis, regeneration and repair.Future science OA · 2026Review
- A cellular basis for the hourglass pattern in vertebrate embryogenesis.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Developmental phylotranscriptomics in grapevine suggests an ancestral role of somatic embryogenesis.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell types are fundamental functional units of multicellular organisms. The evolutionary emergence of new cell types is underpinned by genetic changes, such as gene co-option and cis-regulatory evolution, that propel the assembly or rewiring of molecular networks and give rise to new cell types with specialized functions. Here, we integrate genomic phylostratigraphy with single-cell transcriptomics to explore the evolutionary trends in the assembly of the skeletal cell type-specific gene expression programs. In particular, we investigate how the emergence of lineage-specific genes contributed to this process. We show that osteoblasts and hypertrophic chondrocytes (HC) express evolutionary younger transcriptomes compared to immature chondrocytes that resemble the ancestral skeletogenic program. We demonstrate that the recruitment of lineage-specific genes resulted in subsequent elaboration and individuation of the ancestral chondrogenic gene expression program, propelling the emergence of osteoblasts and HC. Notably, osteoblasts show significant enrichment of vertebrate-specific genes, while HC is enriched in gnathostome-specific genes. By identifying the functional properties of the recruited genes, coupled with the recently discovered fossil evidence, our study challenges the long-standing view on the evolution of vertebrate skeletal structures by suggesting that endochondral ossification and chondrocyte hypertrophy may have already evolved in the last common ancestors of gnathostomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.