ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Temporal trends in hospital-recorded pulmonary embolism in England before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic (2008-2024): a population-based observational study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: A network meta-analysis.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026Article
- Comparison of pulmonary ventilation/perfusion tomography and conventional diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Arterial Lactate in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 infection increases the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). Up-to-date reporting of hospitalisation rates for PE is needed to inform service planning and for benchmarking in light of the pandemic. Our primary aim was to quantify monthly trends in first-time, hospital-recorded PE across England from 2008 to 2024, with particular focus on the pandemic period. A secondary aim was to examine how these trends varied by age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, and region, providing ongoing public access through an interactive online dashboard. Methods: We conducted an epidemiological population-based study of all first-time PE diagnoses using English national secondary care data from April 2008 to December 2024. Trends before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) were compared, with analyses by age, sex, region, and deprivation. Findings: A total of 750,109 first-time PE admissions were identified. Age-standardised first-time hospital-recorded PE rates rose from 5.4 per 100,000 population in April 2008 to 8.5 in January 2020, spiked to 16.8 in January 2021 during the pandemic. The spike was largely accounted for by PEs where COVID-19 was a co-existing diagnosis. Rates have since declined, returning to pre-pandemic levels by early 2023 (e.g. March 2023, 8.6 per 100,000), and may be continuing to decline, subject to further updates. Regional and deprivation gradients persisted throughout but were more pronounced during the pandemic. Interpretation: Whilst incidence of hospital-recorded PE spiked during the COVID-19 pandemic, rates have since returned to levels observed immediately prior to the pre-pandemic. Whilst it is too early to determine whether the recent downward trend may begin to reverse some of the upward trend observed over the decade before the pandemic, continued surveillance of hospital-recorded PE reported via our online tool will keep these findings up to date. Ongoing monitoring of PE incidence by healthcare setting is important to undertake while clinical practice and policy on PE management pathways evolve, since it helps to support care planning; it also informs data-enabled clinical trials where PE is an outcome as well as the design of observational studies. Funding: This work was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford and by Health Data Research UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.