ArticlemBio2025
Degradation of ribosomal RNA during
Article in mBio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- New insights on Plasmodium gene expression from direct RNA sequencing.Trends in parasitology · 2026Review
- SenescentMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Dynamic regulation of long non-coding RNAs across asexual and gametocyte development inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Improved long-transcript representation in Oxford Nanopore direct RNA sequencing with UltraMarathonRT.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The life cycle of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.