Evidence mapPaperPMID 40981069Full record

ReviewEpigenomes2025

Innate Immune Surveillance and Recognition of Epigenetic Marks.

Yalong Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yalong WangDepartment of Epigenetics & Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9557-9101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The innate immune system protects against infection and cellular damage by recognizing conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Emerging evidence suggests that aberrant epigenetic modifications-such as altered DNA methylation and histone marks-can serve as immunogenic signals that activate pattern recognition receptor (PRR)-mediated immune surveillance. This review explores the concept that epigenetic marks may function as DAMPs or even mimic PAMPs. I highlight how unmethylated CpG motifs, which are typically suppressed using host methylation, are recognized as foreign via Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9). I also examine how cytosolic DNA sensors, including cGAS, detect mislocalized or hypomethylated self-DNA resulting from genomic instability. In addition, I discuss how extracellular histones and nucleosomes released during cell death or stress can act as DAMPs that engage TLRs and activate inflammasomes. In the context of cancer, I review how epigenetic dysregulation can induce a "viral mimicry" state, where reactivation of endogenous retroelements produces double-stranded RNA sensed by RIG-I and MDA5, triggering type I interferon responses. Finally, I address open questions and future directions, including how immune recognition of epigenetic alterations might be leveraged for cancer immunotherapy or regulated to prevent autoimmunity. By integrating recent findings, this review underscores the emerging concept of the epigenome as a target of innate immune recognition, bridging the fields of immunology, epigenetics, and cancer biology.

Indexed as

cancer immunotherapyDAMPsepigeneticsimmune recognitionPAMPsPRRsviral mimicry

Identifiers

PMID40981069
PMCPMC12452350

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.