Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40981189›Full record

ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Mapping Cognitive Oncology: A Decade of Trends and Research Fronts.

Anna Tsiakiri, Akyllina Despoti, Panagiota Koutsimani, Kalliopi Megari, Spyridon Plakias, Angeliki Tsapanou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna TsiakiriDepartment of Neurology, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-4093
Akyllina DespotiHellenic Neuropsychological Society, 11636 Athens, Greece.
Panagiota KoutsimaniHellenic Neuropsychological Society, 11636 Athens, Greece.
Kalliopi MegariHellenic Neuropsychological Society, 11636 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5861-7199
Spyridon PlakiasDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, 42100 Trikala, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9511-6940
Angeliki TsapanouHellenic Neuropsychological Society, 11636 Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive and neuropsychological effects of cancer and its treatments have gained increasing attention over the past decade, with growing evidence of persistent deficits across multiple cancer types. While numerous studies have examined these effects, the literature remains fragmented, and no comprehensive bibliometric synthesis has been conducted to map the field's intellectual structure and emerging trends.

methodsA bibliometric and science mapping analysis was performed using the Scopus database to identify peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025 on neuropsychological or cognitive outcomes in adult cancer populations. Data from 179 eligible publications were analyzed with VOSviewer and Microsoft Power BI, applying performance metrics and network mapping techniques, including co-authorship, bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence analyses.

resultsPublication output increased steadily over the decade, with leading contributions from the Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Psycho-Oncology, and Brain Imaging and Behavior. Co-citation analysis identified three core intellectual pillars: (i) clinical characterization of cancer-related cognitive impairment, (ii) mechanistic and neuroimaging-based investigations, and (iii) neurosurgical and neuropathological research in brain tumors. Keyword mapping revealed emerging themes in sleep and circadian rhythm research, biological contributors to cognitive decline, and scalable rehabilitation strategies such as web-based cognitive training. Collaborative networks, while showing dense local clusters, remained moderately fragmented across disciplines.

conclusionsThis review provides the first quantitative, decade-spanning map of cognitive oncology research, highlighting both consolidated knowledge areas and underexplored domains. Future efforts should prioritize methodological standardization, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and integration of cognitive endpoints into survivorship care, with the ultimate aim of improving functional outcomes and quality of life for cancer survivors.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionMedical OncologyNeoplasmsBibliometricsBrain NeoplasmsHumansbibliometric analysiscancer-related cognitive impairmentcognitive rehabilitationneuropsychologyscience mapping

Identifiers

PMID40981189
PMCPMC12452770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.