ReviewClocks & sleep2025
Sleep, Physical Activity, and Executive Functions in Students: A Narrative Review.
Review in Clocks & sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of exercise intervention on executive function in college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- From adolescence to Alzheimer's: a neurodevelopmental lifespan model of cognitive vulnerability.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Sleep Duration and Physical Activity as Predictors of Executive Function in Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Longitudinal associations between physical activity and negative emotions among college students: the chain mediating roles of exercise self-efficacy and psychological resilience.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Differences in cognitive shifts and prefrontal activation among athletes with different motor skills: an fNIRS study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- The interplay between social media use, poor sleep, and disordered eating: a narrative review.Cogent mental health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The school and university periods represent a critical phase in individuals' cognitive, emotional, and behavioural development. Numerous lifestyle factors can influence executive functions and high-level cognitive processes crucial for learning and behavioural adaptation. Sleep and physical activity are two variables that influence executive functions and that could be modified through behavioural interventions. Numerous scientific studies suggest that adequate sleep quality and duration are linked to improved cognitive performance. Similarly, regular physical exercise correlates with neurocognitive benefits. However, these two aspects of lifestyle are often compromised in students, resulting in attention difficulties, reduced working memory, and difficulty in inhibitory control, all aspects of non-optimal executive functioning. Even though the scientific literature separately explores "sleep and executive functions" and "physical activity and executive functions", few studies have integrated the two factors to assess their combined effect on executive functioning, particularly within the student population. The present narrative review aims to outline an integrated theoretical framework of existing scientific literature and to identify any knowledge gaps that may guide future research. It could provide relevant insights for designing preventive or promotional interventions to enhance students' cognitive performance and mental well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.