ArticleOrganic letters2025
Conformational Effects in Intramolecular C(sp
Article in Organic letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cobalt-Catalyzed Halogen-Retentive C-H Activation and Its Application in Medicinal Chemistry.JACS Au · 2026Article
- Terpenes as Naturally Occurring Stereochemical Templates: Conformationally Driven Discovery of Reactivity.Organic letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of cyclohexane derivatives displaying all possible substitution patterns has allowed us to study the influence of the conformational effects in the recently reported gold(I)-catalyzed cycloisomerization reaction of aliphatic 1-bromoalkynes that entails an unusual functionalization of a nonactivated C(sp
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.