ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025
Clinical-radiomic prognostic model integrating staging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTumor regression grade (TRG) and ypTNM are primarily employed to evaluate the efficacy of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in gastric cancer (GC) patients, however, have limited prognostic value. In this study, we established a clinical-radiomic fusion model, without TRG information, for better prognosis assessment of patients following NAC.
methodsA retrospective multicenter study comprising 875 GC patients from three centers was conducted. Cox hazard regression model was used for variable screening and risk weight assignment. Lasso regression was applied for dimensionality reduction and screening of radiomic features. Models were constructed for better prognosis assessment, and were verified in external cohorts.
resultsSurvival analysis showed that dynamic T/N staging changes after NAC could effectively distinguish patients based on prognosis. Moreover, the Clinical SCORE model based on the dynamic T/N staging changes and other clinicopathological data had also been found in internal and external validations to be capable of effectively stratifying patients' risks. For CT images, the identified radiomics features were employed to establish the CT SCORE model, which was subsequently integrated with the Clinical SCORE model to construct the Final SCORE model for prognostic evaluation. In the training and validation cohorts, the prognostic discrimination performance of the Final SCORE model exceeded that of TRG and ypTNM. Furthermore, the final model might also be helpful for the screening of the population benefiting from postoperative adjuvant therapy.
conclusionThe developed clinical-radiomic Final SCORE model showed superior prognostic assessment performance than TRG and ypTNM for prognostic assessment of GC patients following NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40982147What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.