ArticleJAMA network open2025
Prevalence and Trajectories of Perinatal Anxiety and Depression in a Large Urban Medical Center.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation interventions for perinatal depression and anxiety: a systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Mental health symptoms following a pregnancy complicated by cardiovascular disease: scoping review.BJPsych open · 2026Review
- Advancing Maternal Health with Long-Acting Therapeutics: Priorities, Efficacy and Safety Considerations, and Emerging Technologies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- The Antenatal Origins of Postpartum Distress: A Retrospective Longitudinal Analysis of Depression and Anxiety Trajectories.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Risk-Stratified Screening for Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: Integrating Sexual Function, Self-Esteem, and Psychosocial Context.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Can large language models be trusted? Reliability and readability of responses to perinatal depression FAQs.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Perinatal depression and anxiety are common yet underdiagnosed and undertreated. There are limited data on screening rates, severity, and treatment, and thus an urgent need to estimate accurately perinatal depression and anxiety over time, to inform timely and efficacious interventions. Objective: To evaluate screening and treatment rates, prevalence, and symptom trajectories over time of perinatal depression and anxiety in a large urban medical center. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included electronic health records of all patients who gave birth at NewYork-Presbyterian (NYP)/Weill Cornell Medical Center or NYP Lower Manhattan Hospital between December 1, 2020, and February 1, 2024. In March 2023, a mandatory Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) screening policy was implemented in 3 clinics covering 35% of deliveries in the hospital. Exposure: Completion of mental health screening during the perinatal period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study included 3 primary mental health measures: depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), anxiety severity (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]), and perinatal depression severity (EPDS). Percentage of women screened, prevalence of clinically meaningful symptoms, as well as rates and frequency of mental health services were examined. Furthermore, symptom changes 1 year before and after delivery were tested using mixed effects models, and whether patient characteristics and mental health services were associated with symptom change was determined. Results: The study included data from medical records of 27 393 women who gave birth during the study period. The final sample included 3051 women (mean [SD] age, 34.3 [5.2] years; age range, 14-54 years) who completed perinatal depression or anxiety screening within 1 year before and after birth. A total of 723 women (3.0%) were administered depression screening (PHQ-9), and 472 (2.0%) completed anxiety (GAD-7) screening. Following a mandatory screening policy, EPDS screening rates increased from 1.0% (274 women) before March 2023 to 14.2% (2304 women) after March 2023. Of those screened, 23.2% (95% CI, 21.7%-24.8%) reported clinically meaningful depression symptoms and 8.8% (95% CI, 7.2%-10.8%) endorsed suicidality; 17.1% of women (523 women) screened received mental health services. Treated women were mostly seen 4 months before and after birth for psychosocial interventions, had faster depression reductions over time (PHQ-9, F1,1504 = 9.6; P = .002), and a sustained decline in depression severity postpartum, compared with untreated women (F1,5166 = 33.8; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings underscore the need for routine and consistent screening, monitoring, and treatment of perinatal depression and anxiety. Women who received mental health services had faster reductions in depression over time, highlighting the potential impact for scalable and efficacious interventions during this critical period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.