Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40983685›Full record

ReviewNpj imaging2025

Radiomics in preclinical imaging research: methods, challenges and opportunities.

Vlora Riberdy, Alessandro Guida, James Rioux, Kimberly Brewer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Npj imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Next Frontier in Quantitative Co-Clinical Imaging to Advance Functional Precision Oncology.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantitative Imaging of the Mandibular Condyle: Radiomics and Microarchitectural Biomarkers.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vlora RiberdyDepartment of Physics and Atmospheric Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. vl662447@dal.ca.
Alessandro GuidaBiomedical Translational Imaging Centre (BIOTIC), NS Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.
James RiouxDepartment of Physics and Atmospheric Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kimberly BrewerDepartment of Physics and Atmospheric Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics-based analyses are increasingly being applied to clinical studies. Radiomic features can be correlated with markers of disease severity or treatment success to improve early detection of disease and develop predictive models for therapeutic response. While radiomics has similar potential in preclinical research, its use in this context entails unique challenges. This paper provides an overview of the current state of radiomics in preclinical imaging, methodologies, challenges and future prospects.

Identifiers

PMID40983685
PMCPMC12454655

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.